Frequently Asked Questions for IBC
Below is a list of Frequently Asked Questions for IBC and Becoming Your Own Banker.
Don’t see your question? Submit it at the bottom of the page!
What is the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC)?
The Infinite Banking Concept, often called IBC, is a financial strategy that teaches individuals and families to take control of the banking function in their own lives.
The “banking function” is the storage, movement, and repayment of money. Most people depend entirely on outside banks and lenders for this function. IBC teaches you to build and use your own pool of capital so that more of the interest, control, and financial benefit stays within your own family economy.
IBC is not simply “buying life insurance.” In practice, IBC commonly uses a properly designed, dividend-paying whole life insurance policy from a mutual insurance company as the place to store capital. The policy builds cash value, which is a contractually guaranteed value that can be accessed through policy loans.
When you borrow against the policy, the insurance company lends you money using your cash value as collateral. Your policy continues to grow according to the guarantees and dividend-paying performance of the contract, even while you are using borrowed funds elsewhere. As you repay the policy loan, you are restoring your access to capital and practicing the discipline of becoming your own banker.
The goal of IBC is not merely higher returns. The goal is greater control: control over where your money is stored, how it moves, how financing is handled, and how capital is preserved for future needs.
To understand the concept more fully, start with R. Nelson Nash’s book Becoming Your Own Banker and continue reading the educational articles on this site.
Is the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC) a scam?
No, the Infinite Banking Concept is not a scam. IBC is a financial strategy built around taking control of the banking function in your life: the storage, movement, and repayment of money.
That said, skepticism is understandable. Many people hear about IBC in the context of whole life insurance, and whole life insurance is often misunderstood, poorly explained, or badly designed. Some policies are not suitable for IBC, and some agents may present the strategy in a way that overpromises returns, minimizes costs, or makes it sound like a shortcut to wealth.
That is not what IBC is.
Properly understood, IBC is not a get-rich-quick plan, an investment scheme, or a way to avoid financial discipline. It is a long-term capitalization strategy. The goal is to build a pool of accessible, contractually protected capital and use that capital more intentionally throughout your life.
In practice, IBC commonly uses a properly designed, dividend-paying whole life insurance policy from a mutual insurance company. The policy provides cash value, contractual guarantees, death benefit, and the ability to access capital through policy loans.
IBC should be evaluated carefully, with clear illustrations, honest discussion of costs, and a proper understanding of how policy loans, premiums, dividends, and long-term capitalization work.
The concept itself is not a scam. But like any financial strategy, it can be misunderstood, misused, or misrepresented.
What is the banking function?
The banking function is the process of storing, moving, lending, borrowing, and repaying money.
Most people think of a bank as a building or financial institution. But in the Infinite Banking Concept, the focus is not first on the institution. The focus is on the function the bank performs.
A bank stores capital. It lends capital. It receives repayments. It charges interest. It keeps money moving through the economy.
The same principle applies in personal and family finance. Money flows through your life for cars, homes, education, emergencies, business opportunities, taxes, and everyday expenses. The question is: who controls that flow of money?
IBC teaches that individuals and families should seek to control more of the banking function in their own lives by systematically building capital, accessing it when needed, and restoring it through disciplined repayment.
A simple analogy is a blood bank. A blood bank stores blood so it can be used when needed. But if blood is used and never replenished, the bank becomes depleted. In the same way, a financial banking system must store capital, use capital, and replenish capital in order to remain useful.
In short, the banking function is the storage, use, and repayment of money. IBC is about bringing more of that function under your own control.
Can I practice the Infinite Banking Concept with a 401(k) loan or a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC)?
A 401(k) loan or Home Equity Line of Credit can give you access to money, but they are not the same as practicing the Infinite Banking Concept.
IBC is not merely about borrowing. It is about controlling the banking function: storing capital, accessing capital, using capital, and restoring capital through repayment. A properly designed whole life insurance policy is uniquely suited for this because it combines contractual guarantees, liquidity, collateralized access, and continued policy growth.
With a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or similar retirement plan, loan access depends on the rules of the plan. When you borrow from the plan, the borrowed amount is typically removed from the investments inside the account. That means the borrowed portion is no longer positioned to benefit from market gains while the loan is outstanding.
For example, if you have $100,000 in a 401(k), borrow $50,000, and the remaining invested balance grows by 10%, your account gains only on the $50,000 still invested, not the full $100,000.
Retirement plan loans are also limited. Under current IRS rules, the maximum loan is generally the lesser of 50% of your vested account balance or $50,000, with certain exceptions and plan-specific rules. Your employer’s plan may also impose additional restrictions, repayment terms, or limitations.
A HELOC is closer to an IBC policy loan because it uses collateral rather than requiring liquidation. But the collateral is your home, and access is controlled by the bank. The bank may require underwriting, credit approval, income verification, and repayment terms. It may also reduce, freeze, or close the line of credit depending on market conditions, property values, or your credit profile.
A policy loan works differently. With a whole life insurance policy, the life insurance company lends against the policy’s cash value. The cash value serves as collateral, and the policy owner has a contractual right to request a loan against that value according to the terms of the contract. The same company that provides the loan also guarantees the policy’s cash value.
So yes, you can use a 401(k) loan or HELOC as a source of financing. But those tools do not provide the same combination of control, guarantees, liquidity, and uninterrupted policy growth that make properly designed whole life insurance uniquely suited for IBC.
Why is Whole Life Insurance so much more expensive than Term Insurance?
Whole life insurance has a higher price than term insurance, but price and cost are not the same thing.
The price is the premium you pay. The cost is what you give up in exchange.
Term insurance usually has a lower premium because it provides temporary death benefit protection for a specific period of time, such as 10, 20, or 30 years. If the insured dies during that term, the policy pays a death benefit. If the insured outlives the term, the coverage usually ends unless it is renewed or converted according to the terms of the policy.
Whole life insurance has a higher premium because it is designed to provide permanent death benefit protection, build cash value, provide contractual guarantees, and give the policy owner access to capital through policy loans.
That is why comparing term and whole life only by premium is incomplete. Term insurance and whole life insurance are not the same financial instrument. Term insurance is temporary protection. Whole life insurance is permanent protection with cash value, guarantees, and living benefits.
For the Infinite Banking Concept, this distinction matters. IBC is not only concerned with the price of insurance. It is concerned with the cost of giving up control of your capital.
A properly designed whole life policy allows you to store capital, access that capital through policy loans, and continue building the banking function in your life. A term policy may provide death benefit protection, but it does not build capital or provide the same ability to finance life through policy loans.
This does not mean term insurance is bad. Term insurance can be useful when someone needs a large amount of temporary death benefit at a lower initial premium. But it is not designed to support the Infinite Banking Concept.
So, why is whole life insurance more expensive? Because it does more. The premium is higher, but the policy provides permanent protection, cash value, guarantees, liquidity, and contractual access to capital.
The better question is not simply, “Which policy has the lower premium?” The better question is, “What am I giving up by choosing one over the other?”
Why would I pay interest to borrow my own money?
With a whole life insurance policy loan, you are not borrowing your own money; you are borrowing from the life insurance company and using your policy’s cash value as collateral.
That distinction matters.
If you withdraw money from an account, you reduce the amount of capital working for you. But with a policy loan, your cash value remains inside the policy and continues to grow according to the guarantees and dividend-paying performance of the contract. The insurance company lends its money to you, and your policy serves as collateral for the loan.
The interest you pay is the cost of accessing capital without liquidating the asset.
This is different from borrowing from a 401(k). With many retirement plan loans, the borrowed amount is removed from the investments inside the plan. That means the borrowed portion is no longer positioned to benefit from market gains while the loan is outstanding. You may also be subject to plan rules, repayment schedules, and employment-related restrictions.
With a properly designed whole life insurance policy, the policy owner has a contractual right to request a loan against the available cash value. There is no credit check, no income verification, and no need to explain the purpose of the loan.
So the question is not simply, “Why pay interest?” The better question is, “What am I preserving by paying that interest?”
In IBC, the answer is control, liquidity, access to capital, and the continued growth of the policy.
Does the insurance company keep the cash value when you die?
No. The insurance company does not keep the cash value and pay the death benefit as if they were two separate benefits.
Cash value and death benefit are not two separate benefits that both get paid out at death. The cash value is the policy owner’s equity in the life insurance contract during life. The death benefit is the amount payable to the beneficiary when the insured dies, minus any outstanding policy loans and loan interest.
As a whole life policy matures over time, the cash value grows toward the death benefit. At death, the insurance company pays the death benefit according to the terms of the contract. The beneficiary does not receive the death benefit plus the cash value because the cash value is already part of the policy’s value.
A simple analogy is home equity.
Suppose you bought a house for $200,000. Over time, you paid down the mortgage and the house increased in value to $350,000. If you sell the house for $350,000, the realtor does not give you $350,000 plus your equity as a second payment. You receive the value of the house through the sale price.
The same basic idea applies to whole life insurance. The cash value is not something the insurance company secretly keeps. It is the living equity value of the policy, while the death benefit is the amount paid when the insured dies.
The better question is not, “Does the insurance company keep the cash value?” The better question is, “How does the policy provide value during life and at death?”
During life, the policy provides cash value, guarantees, liquidity, and access to policy loans. At death, the policy pays the death benefit to the beneficiary, reduced by any outstanding loans.
What is the difference between base premium and paid-up additions?
Base premium and paid-up additions both purchase life insurance death benefit. The difference is in how that death benefit is purchased and how quickly it creates cash value.
The base premium pays for the original whole life insurance policy. It supports the policy’s base death benefit, guarantees, expenses, and long-term structure. In that sense, the base premium is like the required installment payment that keeps the main policy in force.
Paid-up additions, often called PUAs, are also life insurance. A paid-up addition is a small, fully paid-up piece of additional whole life insurance added to the base policy. PUAs may be purchased with dividends or with additional out-of-pocket premium, depending on the design of the policy and available riders.
Because a PUA is paid up immediately, it creates cash value more efficiently than base premium. That is why properly designed IBC policies often emphasize paid-up additions: they help increase early cash value, liquidity, and death benefit.
So, the base premium does not “buy death benefit” while PUAs “buy cash.” Both buy death benefit. PUAs simply buy small blocks of paid-up death benefit that produce a higher immediate cash value relative to the premium paid.
Are Dividends from Mutual Insurance Companies Guaranteed?
No. Dividends from mutual life insurance companies are not guaranteed.
A participating whole life insurance policy may be eligible to receive dividends, but the insurance company’s board of directors decides each year whether a dividend will be paid and how much it will be. Dividends depend on the company’s actual experience, including mortality, expenses, investment performance, and other business factors.
At Reformed Finance, we only work with insurance companies that have long histories of paying dividends consistently, including companies with more than 100 consecutive years of dividend payments. But past dividend history does not make future dividends guaranteed.
Once a dividend is paid, the policy owner can usually choose how that dividend is used, depending on the options available in the policy. For Infinite Banking Concept policies, dividends are commonly used to purchase paid-up additions. Paid-up additions increase both the policy’s cash value and death benefit, and once purchased, they become part of the policy’s guaranteed values.
So, dividends themselves are not guaranteed. But when dividends are paid and used to buy paid-up additions, those additions permanently increase the policy’s cash value and death benefit according to the terms of the contract.
Is the Infinite Banking Concept just a tax loophole?
No. The Infinite Banking Concept is not a tax loophole. It uses long-standing features of whole life insurance, including cash value, policy loans, and the tax treatment of life insurance contracts.
A tax loophole usually implies that someone is exploiting an unintended gap in the law. IBC is different. Whole life insurance and policy loans are not new, hidden, or unusual. They are part of the structure of properly designed permanent life insurance contracts.
Life insurance in America dates back to the 1700s. The Corporation for Relief of Poor and Distressed Widows and Children of Presbyterian Ministers, often recognized as the first American life insurance company, was founded in 1759. The modern federal income tax did not arrive until the Sixteenth Amendment was ratified in 1913.
So, while IBC can have tax advantages, it is not based on a gimmick. The tax treatment comes from the legal classification of life insurance, dividends, and loans. Policy loans are generally not treated the same way as taxable income because they are loans secured by the policy, not income paid to the policy owner. However, taxes can apply if a policy is surrendered, lapses, or is handled improperly. The IRS notes that when a life insurance policy is surrendered for cash, proceeds above the policy’s cost may be taxable, and unrepaid loans can affect that calculation.
The purpose of IBC is not to exploit the tax code. The purpose is to take control of the banking function in your life by building capital, maintaining liquidity, and using policy loans to finance needs without liquidating the policy.
The tax advantages are real, but they are not the foundation of the strategy. They are a result of using a properly designed life insurance contract according to its intended structure.
Why aren’t Dividends with Mutual Insurance Companies taxed?
Life insurance dividends are generally not taxable because they are treated as a return of premium, not ordinary investment income.
With a participating whole life insurance policy, the insurance company charges premiums based on conservative assumptions about mortality, expenses, investment performance, and future obligations. If the company’s actual experience is better than expected, it may return a portion of the premium to participating policy owners in the form of a dividend.
That is why life insurance dividends are usually treated differently than stock dividends. A stock dividend is generally a distribution of corporate profit. A life insurance dividend is generally treated as a partial return of the premiums you paid into the policy.
For a non-MEC life insurance contract, IRS Publication 550 states that dividends distributed to the policy owner are treated as a partial return of premium and are not included in gross income until they exceed the total net premiums paid for the contract. However, interest paid or credited on dividends left with the insurance company is taxable interest income.
For Infinite Banking Concept policies, dividends are often used to purchase paid-up additions. In that case, the dividend is not taken as spendable income; it is used to buy additional paid-up life insurance, which increases the policy’s cash value and death benefit.
So the short answer is this: life insurance dividends are generally not taxed because they are usually classified as a return of premium. They may become taxable if they exceed the policy owner’s cost basis, if interest is earned on dividends left with the insurer, or if the policy is classified as a Modified Endowment Contract..
Why aren’t policy loans taxed?
Policy loans are generally not taxed because a loan is not income.
When you borrow money from a bank to buy a car or a house, the loan proceeds are not treated as taxable income. The same basic principle applies to a whole life insurance policy loan. You are borrowing money from the insurance company and using your policy’s cash value as collateral.
That is different from a withdrawal or surrender. A withdrawal from a life insurance policy usually reduces the policy’s cash value and death benefit. If withdrawals or surrendered values exceed your cost basis in the policy, the gain may be taxable. Your cost basis is generally the premiums you paid into the policy, adjusted for certain items such as prior withdrawals or dividends received in cash.
For example, if you paid $50,000 in premium and the policy has $70,000 of cash value, a withdrawal of $60,000 may create taxable income to the extent the amount received exceeds your basis.
A policy loan is treated differently. If you paid $50,000 in premium, have $70,000 in cash value, and take a $60,000 policy loan from a non-MEC life insurance policy, the loan is generally not taxable when received because it is debt secured by the policy, not income.
However, policy loans can create tax problems if the policy lapses or is surrendered with an outstanding loan. In that case, the loan may be treated as part of the amount received from the policy, and any gain above your cost basis may become taxable. The IRS explains that when a life insurance policy is surrendered for cash, amounts received above the cost of the policy are taxable.
There is also an important exception for Modified Endowment Contracts, or MECs. If a life insurance policy becomes a MEC, loans and withdrawals are generally taxed differently and may be taxable to the extent there is gain in the policy. A MEC may also trigger an additional tax penalty if the policy owner is under age 59½.
So, policy loans are generally not taxed because loans are not income. But the policy must be structured and managed properly, especially to avoid unintended lapse, surrender, or MEC treatment.
What is a properly designed policy for Infinite Banking?
There is no single “properly designed” policy for the Infinite Banking Concept. Proper design depends on the policy owner’s needs, goals, income, savings capacity, health, age, family situation, and long-term objectives.
In general, a properly designed IBC policy is a participating whole life insurance policy structured to build strong cash value, maintain long-term death benefit protection, and give the policy owner meaningful access to capital through policy loans.
For IBC, the policy should not be designed only to maximize death benefit. It should be designed to support the banking function: storing capital, accessing capital, using capital, and restoring capital through repayment.
This often means using a blend of base premium and paid-up additions so the policy owner can place as much capital into the policy as appropriate, for as long as appropriate, without violating the rules that would cause the policy to become a Modified Endowment Contract unless that outcome is intentional and suitable.
At Reformed Finance, our design philosophy is simple: structure the policy so the owner can capitalize it efficiently, access liquidity when needed, and use the policy as part of a long-term family banking system.
Your properly designed policy may not look exactly like someone else’s. The right design is the one that fits your financial situation, your goals, and your ability to consistently capitalize the system over time.
During the client process, we help you evaluate those factors and design a strategy that supports your ability to practice the Infinite Banking Concept with confidence and discipline.
Why shouldn’t I use Indexed Universal Life for Infinite Banking?
Indexed Universal Life, often called IUL, is not the policy type Nelson Nash taught for the Infinite Banking Concept. In Becoming Your Own Banker, Nash specifically emphasized the use of dividend-paying whole life insurance with a mutual insurance company.
The issue is not merely personal preference. It comes down to both philosophy and product design.
IBC is about taking control of the banking function in your life. That requires guarantees, stable capitalization, long-term control, and a policy structure that becomes more efficient over time. A properly designed whole life policy from a mutual insurance company is built around those characteristics.
With a mutual company, policy owners participate in the company through eligible dividends. The insurance company is not owned by outside stockholders. That matters because IBC treats the insurance company as a long-term financial partner in your banking system.
Indexed Universal Life works differently. IUL is a flexible premium universal life policy with annually renewable insurance costs, policy expenses, index-crediting formulas, caps, participation rates, spreads, and other non-guaranteed elements. The insurance company usually reserves the contractual right to change certain charges and crediting factors within the limits of the policy.
That creates a different risk profile.
With IUL, the policy owner bears more of the long-term performance risk. If policy charges rise, index crediting underperforms, caps are reduced, or the policy is underfunded, the policy can become less efficient over time and may require additional premium to remain in force.
That is not ideal for IBC.
A policy used for Infinite Banking should be designed around reliable capitalization, predictable access to cash value, contractual guarantees, and long-term durability. Whole life insurance is not perfect, and policy design still matters, but it provides a stronger foundation for the banking function than IUL.
So the short answer is this: IUL may be marketed as a cash accumulation tool, but it is not the same as dividend-paying whole life insurance. For the Infinite Banking Concept, Reformed Finance uses properly designed participating whole life insurance because it better supports guarantees, liquidity, control, and long-term capitalization.
How much money do I need to start Infinite Banking?
There is no universal minimum premium required to start practicing the Infinite Banking Concept. The right premium depends on your age, health, income, savings capacity, family needs, policy design, and long-term goals.
Some clients may be able to start with a very small policy. But a very small premium will also produce a very small amount of death benefit and cash value. That means the policy will not create much usable capital in the early years.
The larger point is this: IBC is a capitalization strategy. The more capital you can consistently and responsibly put into a properly designed policy, the faster you can build cash value, liquidity, and financing ability.
That does not mean you should overcommit. A policy should be funded at a level that is both comfortable and meaningful. If the premium is too low, the policy may not build enough capital to be useful for your goals. If the premium is too high, it may become difficult to maintain consistently.
For most families, the best starting point is to identify how much money is already flowing through savings, debt repayment, future purchases, or other financial priorities, then determine how much of that flow can be redirected into a properly designed whole life policy.
So the answer is not, “What is the smallest policy I can buy?” The better question is, “How much capital can I consistently commit to building my banking system?”
That number will be different for each person. The goal is to start with a premium that fits your current situation while giving you a strong foundation to build on over time.
Am I too old to start Infinite Banking ?
No, you are not necessarily too old to start practicing the Infinite Banking Concept. Age matters, but it does not automatically disqualify you.
IBC is about controlling the banking function in your life: storing capital, accessing capital, using capital, and restoring capital through repayment. As long as you still need access to money, liquidity, and financial control, the concept remains relevant.
That said, age and health do affect policy design. A person starting at age 55, 65, or 70 may receive a different amount of death benefit for the same premium than someone starting at age 30 or 40. Underwriting, insurability, premium structure, cash value, and long-term goals all need to be considered.
In some cases, the best policy may be on your own life. In other cases, it may make more sense to own a policy on someone else in whom you have an insurable interest, such as a spouse, child, or business partner.
The key question is not simply, “Am I too old?” The better question is, “What is the best way to control capital from where I am right now?”
Younger policy owners generally have more time for capitalization and compounding. But older policy owners may still benefit from liquidity, guarantees, policy loans, death benefit, and the ability to organize capital more intentionally.
Infinite Banking is not primarily about chasing a rate of return. It is about control: control over where your money is stored, how it moves, how financing is handled, and how capital is preserved for future needs.
So no, you are not automatically too old to start. The right strategy depends on your age, health, goals, family situation, available capital, and the purpose of the policy.
Is the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC) consistent with Biblical Stewardship?
Yes. The Infinite Banking Concept can be consistent with biblical stewardship when it is practiced as a tool for faithful governance, not as a way to idolize wealth, avoid work, or pursue financial autonomy apart from God.
Biblical stewardship begins with ownership. God owns all things, and we are managers of what He entrusts to us. Stewardship is not merely budgeting, avoiding debt, or setting aside a little money for the future. It is the active and faithful governance of resources under God’s authority.
IBC supports this idea by helping families take greater responsibility for the flow of capital in their lives. Most households outsource the banking function entirely. Income comes in, expenses go out, debts are paid to outside institutions, and interest leaves the family economy. IBC asks a different question: who should control the capital God has entrusted to you while it moves through your life?
From a biblical worldview, this matters even more because the modern financial system is not morally neutral. Scripture condemns unjust weights and measures, and inflationary fiat money can function as a modern form of unjust measurement. Fractional reserve banking then multiplies that distortion by creating new money through lending, which erodes purchasing power and transfers wealth over time. In that sense, IBC can be understood not only as a financial strategy, but also as a practical way for families to reduce their dependence on a system that often works against faithful stewardship.
Practiced properly, IBC encourages long-term thinking, disciplined capitalization, repayment, liquidity, provision for family, and generational responsibility. It can help families finance needs, prepare for opportunities, support charitable giving, and build a family economy instead of depending entirely on outside banks and lenders.
That does not make IBC a command of Scripture. It is not a doctrine or a requirement for faithful Christians. It is a financial strategy. Like any tool, it can be used wisely or foolishly. If used for greed, pride, speculation, or mere personal comfort, it would not be faithful stewardship.
But when used to exercise responsible dominion, preserve capital, provide for one’s household, reduce unnecessary dependence on outside financial institutions, and prepare resources for future generations, the Infinite Banking Concept can be a practical expression of biblical stewardship.
The goal is not to become rich for its own sake. The goal is to manage capital faithfully, maintain control over what has been entrusted to you, and use money as a tool for family provision, generosity, and long-term faithfulness.
Can a church use the Infinite Banking Concept (IBC)?
Yes. A church can use the Infinite Banking Concept, but it must be done carefully, with proper governance, clear authority, and a policy design that fits the church’s actual needs.
Churches need capital. They must pay pastors and staff, maintain buildings, fund ministry, support missions, prepare for emergencies, and think beyond the current budget year. Biblical stewardship requires more than simply keeping expenses low. It requires the faithful governance of the resources God has entrusted to the church.
IBC can help a church take greater control of the banking function. Instead of storing all reserves in a bank account and relying entirely on outside lenders for major expenses, a church may be able to build capital in a properly designed, church-owned whole life insurance policy. The church can then access policy value through policy loans for legitimate church needs, while the policy continues to provide guarantees, liquidity, and death benefit protection.
This is especially relevant because the modern financial system is not morally neutral. As argued in Reformed Finance articles on biblical finance, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, and inflation create serious stewardship concerns by distorting money, eroding purchasing power, and transferring wealth through monetary expansion. IBC does not abolish that system, but it can help a church reduce unnecessary dependence on it and exercise more direct control over capital.
A church-owned policy must be structured properly. The church needs an insurable interest in the insured person, proper corporate authority, documented approval from the appropriate governing body, clear ownership and beneficiary arrangements, and a plan for premium funding, policy loans, repayment, and future continuity. These decisions should be made transparently and in accordance with the church’s bylaws, denominational rules, and applicable law.
IBC is not a substitute for wise budgeting, generous giving, elder oversight, or ordinary financial prudence. It is also not a way to speculate with church funds. Used improperly, it can create confusion, strain cash flow, or expose the church to avoidable risk.
But used wisely, IBC can be a tool for long-term church stewardship. It can help a church preserve liquidity, finance major needs, protect against financial disruption, build institutional durability, and prepare resources for future ministry.
The goal is not for the church to become wealthy for its own sake. The goal is for the church to manage capital faithfully so it can better provide for ministry, care for its people, support future generations, and serve Christ with greater financial resilience.